"it's harder to be kind than clever"–Jeff Bezos 2010 Princeton Baccalaureate remarks–worth 2 minutes
http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S27/52/51O99/index.xml
Seeking the next gen supply chain technology breakthroughs
"it's harder to be kind than clever"–Jeff Bezos 2010 Princeton Baccalaureate remarks–worth 2 minutes
http://www.princeton.edu/main/news/archive/S27/52/51O99/index.xml
Image via Wikipedia
I am a big fan of Michael Lewis' writing, starting with Liar's Poker in the late 1980's, The New, New Thing and Money Ball in the early 2000's. And The Big Short is perhaps the best book he has ever written.
If you want to understand what happened to Wall Street and our economy over the last decade, then his book is the place to start. It is people that ultimately make the good and bad decisions about creating and selling financial instruments and the best and brightest were mostly on the sidelines (thanks, Alan Greenspan) when the creation of credit default swaps (CDSs) and Collateralized Debt Obligations (CDOs) proliferated and became the downfall of finance as we knew it.
Lewis does a superb job of following the fortunes of people on both sides of the trade–those on Wall Street who were creating these repackaged sub prime mortgages and those hedge funds and individuals who were betting against them. His narrative goes back and forth between the money hungry investment bankers who can't create the junk fast enough, the rating agencies who get convinced that this is all triple A rated debt, AIG who cannot insure the junk fast enough and a small group of contrarians who make massive bets against these new financial instruments (hence the title, The Big Short). You get to see all sides of the story in living color and gory detail.
The amazing part is the end when the bubble has burst and the shorts win. They do not feel victory or become heroes, having just witnessed the near collapse of the world financial systems. Sure, they made a lot of money but none seem very happy about it and either do their investors. A weird and tragic ending, since the whole story has yet to play out. FIVE STARS OUT OF FIVE…but depressing.
Venture Hacks this morning featured three interesting start-up case studies on how they got their funding: http://venturehacks.com/articles/three-financings
Image by Getty Images via Daylife
David Liss' superb first novel, A Conspiracy of Paper, reaches back to London in the 1700s to wrap a mystery around the simultaneous emergence of venture capital and stock exchanges. One of the few people ever to turn a PhD thesis into a best selling book, Liss explores the criminal underbelly of the new world of exotic venture companies( The South Sea Company, for example) and the competition with the Bank of England for control of the English financial system. All the usual suspects are in place–the hated and rich Jews, corrupt "stock jobbers", murky CEOs, minions often bribed for favors, criminal gangs and best of all, the gullible royalty.
Benjamin Weaver, an ex-boxer, Jew and consummate outsider, plays the heavy in this tale of stock fraud, idiotic projects and unsuspecting investors desperate for outrageous (and impossible) returns. If this sounds a lot like the early 2000's in the US venture community, you are right on. The London of the early 1700s is a lot more rough than Silicon Valley in the early 2000's but the results are the same–lots of money thrown at questionable companies, much hype in the media and then everyone wakes up one morning to ask why a company with no revenues and little promise of any is worth millions. Duh….
This is a well written thriller that appealed both to the mystery lover in me as well as the venture guy. I found myself saying, " what a dumb presentation–I'd never fund that dog" and "what are these dopey investors thinking??" Lots of fun, enough history to make it all believable and a good dose of realistic London life in the 1700s–not very pretty, where life was cheap and hanging was the usual penalty for most any offense by the lower classes.
AngelList, started in February by angels Naval Ravikant and Babak Nivi, vets dozens of deals before highlighting the best ones in emails each week sent free to a group of 200 investors.
Messrs. Ravikant and Nivi—who also run Venture Hacks, a for-profit site that provides advice to start-ups—say they have received pitches from more than 1,000 start-ups, mostly consumer Internet companies. Of the 48 companies featured so far on AngelList, about half have received funding, they say.
Worth a try. Check out the details here…AngelList for start ups
Image via Wikipedia
Whole Foods announced this week that it would be recycling wine corks via Cork ReHarvest in all its 292 stores in the US, Canada and the United Kingdom. In a previous Blog, I reported that Whole Foods was doing a pilot program with ReCork but that evidently that relationship faltered. Cork ReHarvest was spun out of Willamette Valley Vineyards in 2008.
Beginning in April 2010, Whole Foods will begin collecting corks from customers. The corks will then be send to various reprocessing centers for recycling into new products. Corks from the West Coast will go to Western Pulp in Corvallis, Oregon to be made into recyclable wine shipping containers. Midwest corks will go to Yemm & Hart, a manufacturer of cork floor tiles. East Coast and UK corks will be used by Jelinek Cork Group to create a variety of cork products.
Ninety nine percent of the 13 billion corks used each year have historically ended up in landfills. Continuing to use corks for wine is environmentally friendlier than fake corks (made with petroleum products) and screw tops (not recyclable in the US). Cork is a sustainable resource, harvested from trees, many over 300 years old. The tree is not harmed and thousands of farmers depend on cork production for their livelihood.
Congratulations to Whole Foods for taking this big step forward to end waste in our food supply chain. Now my wife has another reason to get me to stop collecting corks along with wine….
It usually takes about a decade to determine if a new business model will be successful in supply chain. In the late 1990's, the rush to develop on-line buyer/seller networks in every industry was the new, new thing in supply chain. Very few succeeded. One of them is Elemica.
Founded in 1999 by 22 leading chemical companies, Elemica now processes over $60 billion in transactions across 2500 companies, including most major suppliers to the industry. Elemica provides chemical industry supply chain participants with sourcing, order fulfillment, procurement, inventory replenishment and logistics technology solutions, all in a cloud computing environment. In 2009, Elemica acquired RubberNetwork.com LLC to further expand their offerings in the space.
Why did Elemica succeed when so many others failed? Here are a few thoughts:
Elemica is the model for supply chain innovation in other industries. It is too bad that the idea is taking so long to be accepted. Substantial cost savings have been achieved by doing collaborative development and management–savings shared by all partners. Perhaps others can now build off the model and create other exchanges.
Image via Wikipedia
Bill
Warner, Avid founder and long time innovation activist has recently
published a manifesto on his blog setting the bar for the VC community. Declaring that we
have too many singles and doubles, and not enough home runs, Bill is proposing
we adopt a new nomenclature in our innovation economy. Here is Bill Warner’s
proposed scorecard:
Single
Any growing company that is selling
a successful product. This would mean any company that successfully reaches the
market and serves a growing need. Essentially, you’re on base once you show
that more and more people need your product.
Double
Any growing company with sales over
$10M.
Triple
Any growing company with sales over
$100M. Local or distant leadership. Note: huge acquisitions by distant
companies will still be considered a triple due to loss of local leadership.
Home Run
>$1B market cap. Local leadership.
Grand Slam
>$10B market cap. Dominates its
market; fast market growth. Local leadership.
Bill followed his scorecard
manifesto with some practical suggestions on how to improve the score in this playbook.
I like Bill's thought process on this one. Too often, everyone sets their sights too low and looks for the quick exit. If you have good ideas, the right leadership and a well structured company, why not think big?
Dedicated to all those frequent flyers out there…flights from hell.com http://www.flightsfromhell.com/
Image by Search Engine People Blog via Flickr
One of the big issues I have with fledgling entrepreneurs is their inability to express their ideas in a simple story that anyone can understand.
Plancruncher is an interesting tool that allows an entrepreneur to use some basic tools to condense their great ideas into a one page summary which a potential investor can quickly review and decide if they want to see more information.
My thanks to Jean-Baptiste, a commenter on my Blog, for pointing out this useful resource.