• I’m Having an Out-of-Money Experience.

    I recently saw this slogan(check out Winston Smith’s poster above) on a t-shirt worn by a bored looking guy in Rome, accompanying his well dressed(read:expensively) girl friend/wife/mistress, who was headed into Prada.

    It made me think of fund raising by start-ups and the pitfalls of waiting too long to secure money to carry out business plans. I must speak with one entrepreneur per week who is having some sort of out-of-money experience.  Oh, I know, you are saying, isn’t this what start ups are all about?  Not in my book.

    Too many entrepreneurs are in denial about money issues, always having a good reason why they should not worry about where the next payroll will come from. This is a big red flag for investors.  I will not invest in a company in money trouble under an circumstances, even one run by a good friend.  To me, having an out of money experience is a sign of poor management at best and incompetence at worst. 

    Let me offer a few suggestions as to why this is no way to run a startup:

    1. Lean & Mean. A well thought out business plan and budget, with early customer acquisition and pilots, rapid release of software and tight controls over unnecessary spending (you honestly do not all need Aeron chairs) is the best way to manage any startup.  Only about 50% of the startups I see have this discipline.  The ones that do are the most successful.

    2. Clear Financial Options. No one can predict all financing needs in a small company, but you better have options available before they are needed.  Like that line of credit you never seem to get around to. Having cash available in advance is a lot cheaper than pleading with your bank in a money crunch, or having to give your investors 100% warrant coverage to get a bridge loan.

    3. Dialog with Investors.  This should be a constant process in all stages of growth.  You never know when you will need them.  Take all phone calls from VC’s , banks, PE firms and other potential investors. Initiate quarterly discussion with the ones you like the best, asking them about the state of the market and what financing options are available.

    Every startup may have a short term money crunch now and then, especially when receivables are late.  That is a normal and expected part of business, one that a carefully drawn up budget should be able to manage. 

    Just be sure that the crunch does not happen constantly and end up turning into an out-of-money experience.

  • One of the most consistent mistakes among startup CEO’s is not preparing or over preparing the board in advance of meetings.

    I recognize that there are two very different schools of thought on this subject–one school, which I’ll call "full and equal disclosure" ,says everyone should hear the same messages at the same time and them discuss things in a collective environment.  The other, the "schmooze the key players in advance" school says that the CEO should alert key Board members about certain topics and have a preliminary discussion as to how best present any issues, etc.

    I have been members of both kinds of boards.

    My take?  Either approach, taken in it’s extreme, is bound to cause problems.  In the "full and equal disclosure" board meetings, I have sat through sessions that wasted huge amount of time because one or more Board members simply had no idea what was going on in the company.  They were not that involved in the company and the CEO had not taken the time to bring them up to date prior to the meeting.  In the "schmooze the key players in advance" boards, I have attended meetings where everything seemed to be decided in advance by a few Board members and the CEO. You have to ask yourself if the potential liabilities from "hidden decisions" is worth the benefits of participation.

    The optimal board management process should include both one-to-one discussions as well as collective decision making.  As long as everyone is treated equally up front and made aware of issues that may be contentious, collective discussions can occur among better informed participants. The problems arise when smaller cliques form and board decision making happens at the micro level instead of at the full meetings.

    CEO’s need to treat all Board members as equal decision makers. Anything else can cause conflict and problems for the Board. Not prepping the Board at all creates the wrong environment for decision making, with too much time being spent of bringing everyone up to speed and too little on honest debate and decision making.

  • I have the greatest respect for Fred Wilson at Union Square Ventures.  I read his Blog postings daily.  He and his partners are fond of publishing erudite VC Blogs on "The VC Cliche of the Week".  Their postings often violate the promise I made to my readers in my initial Blog in early 2006.  For those who do not wish to double click on the link, the short story is that I was going to avoid business school textbook advice, which in my mind, provided little use to the true entrepreneur.

    Thus, my first anti-cliche–"you are in the hands of the gods".  Many VC’s would like you to think that there is some magic formula to a startup, which, if you can only figure it out yields success.  They generally won’t tell you what they think the formula is for your market space( although I provide some insights into the formula in an earlier Blog, The Secret Sauce of Success) and will advise you at a high level as best they can, but let’s admit it–if a better funded, very competitive solution comes along which has a faster take up in the market, you and your company are truly "in the hands of the gods".  What these means is that the VC’s may begin to lose interest in your business model and redirect their efforts to other portfolio companies. Oh, they will attend your board meetings and answer your calls, but their minds are elsewhere, leaving you with no true patrons but the gods.

    I am not going to tell you how to get out of this pickle.  The point is not to get there is in the first place. Here are some suggestions:

    • Yesterday’s Technology Platform:  A common mistake I see is software written using outdated technology business models.  If your market competitors are single tenancy and/or ASP’s, think SaaS. Focus on where the customers are moving and position your platform ahead of the curve. If you need good channel partners to sell your product, consider MS .net or SAP netweaver environments.
    • Customers as Your Product Designers: Invest significant time in working with key customers on designing product features and functionality. If you don’t, your smarter competitors will and beat you to the punch.
    • Analysts as Market Makers: You and your technology don’t make markets, industry analysts do. You may have a really whiz bang technology, but unless the analysts agree, you can easily be supplanted in the marketplace by companies with inferior technologies, but who have worked with the analysts to define the new space–and had you left out of their "magic quadrant".  Make sure the analysts know about what you are up to and do a good job explaining it to their clients.

    Being in the hands of the gods is not a good thing under any circumstances.  Better to remain in the hands of your angels and VC’s by keeping your company correctly positioned for success in the long term.

  • I have recently run into a number of DIY entrepreneurs.  These are "do it yourself" people who fervently believe in their ideas, business models and roll out strategy, to the point where other opinions are deemed negative vibe or destructive.

    Give me a break. 

    Why did you call me in the first place?  Do you think I write checks for a living?  Am I to write these checks without asking some basic questions about how my money will be used?  Why do you get upset with me when I do not necessarily agree with what you are doing?

    I spend the better part of 30 plus hours per week exploring the markets I plan to invest in.  I speak with friends and other VC’s. I call industry users and see what they think they need–these are the potential customers of all the good ideas. I surf the Internet to see what others are saying and doing.  I subscribe to perhaps 15 Blog feeds and innumerable newsletters. Whew.

    I do this because I love what I do. I want to be ahead of the next new, new thing.  If you have this new, new thing and I agree with you, I will write you a check. If I do not agree with you, I will have further discussion to see if you are willing to look at different options of making your idea work.  If you are not, then no check.

    Being an entrepreneur mean being adaptable. It also means having a capable network of advisor’s who you can constantly turn to for advice and counsel.  It means being open to changes in strategy, new ideas and new directions.

    Being an entrepreneur does not mean going it alone, thinking only you have all the right ideas and that any criticism is wrong.  Don’t be a DIY entrepreneur if you want to be successful and be funded.

    VC’s don’t have the time or energy to waste on those who believe that success is doing it yourself without anyone’s help or assistance.  I invest because I am interested in working with people to make them and their ideas successful. That’s it.  No other motivations.  So why won’t you listen to me again?

  • Many start ups, concerned about their investors and product delivery dates to customers, often neglect the social aspects of business culture.  Socialization is an important part of any business, and those that do it well are often the most successful in the market. Socialization also has two different, but interrelated aspects: externally with vendors, investors and customers and inside the company with your team.

    The old adage about deals being consummated on the golf course, or in the case of my son’s "new age" consulting company, the paintball battlefield, is still very true.  People want and expect the intermingling of social and business activities in order to better know their business partners.  I am not speaking about the glad-handing sales guy who constantly calls you to take you out to lunch, blathers incessantly about how great his products are, and puts the hard sell on you before the check arrives. Rather, I am referring to participation in carefully arranged events where you can spend time learning about the lives of others in social settings. These are valuable ways to form a stronger bond between you, your customers, your Board and your investors. 

    Similarly, developing and then respecting the right social culture inside your own company is also a key factor behind successful growth.  Most of the CEO’s in my investment portfolio used to work for me at Accenture.  Accenture was on a very fast growth track in the 1990’s and we were often hiring one or two new employees into supply chain consulting per week.  Integrating these people into the team was a major task of my managers.  We all spent many lunches and dinners together discussing how to integrate new consultants, better serve our clients, run the practice or just talking about families, sports or the world in general.  We held team dinners, did team days off site to build skills and just get to know everyone better.  We met after work at local watering holes to recap the day’s events.  Socialization as a mentoring tool was a big deal at Accenture and helped account for much of our successful growth over time.

    Here are a few things to consider about being social in business settings:

    1. Neglecting the socialization factor in developing your company’s culture can be a big mistake, leading to higher attrition, less dedicated employees and perhaps even fewer customers, if they think that you do not care about them as people. 
    2. Having a unique culture people can relate to is also important.  My son’s company, Control Group, like many others I suspect, has a Blackberry culture.  A significant amount of business is conducted via the thumb club, but the Blackberry is also used to get staff to come down to whatever bar the partners may be hanging around in after work.
    3. Customers and investors also want to be part of the company’s culture, albeit for different reasons.  Invite your Board and investors to company events, including annual customer meetings. Ask them to participate in client dinners so that potential customers can see the experts you have chosen to work with you.  Most importantly, go to lunch or dinner with members of your board or your investors often, so that you better know and trust each other.
  • One of my good friends, Art Mesher, CEO of Descartes Systems (and a great turnaround story in the supply chain software world) is fond  of expressing his feelings towards the merger and acquisition space as wanting to "be the diner, not the dinner".

    This advise should be taken to heart by all entrepreneurs.  If you start your company with the idea that an acquisition by Oracle, Google, IBM or whoever is going to be your exit strategy, then you will likely doom yourself and your people to limited exit options and perhaps not the best market valuation. 

    The essence of start ups and entrepreneurs is building a competitive business, with customers who want innovative solutions and believe in what you are doing.  Trying to design for exit early in the life of a start up diverts energy from your primary goals–building a great company that customers and investors respect.

    If you instill an ethic in your start-up that you are going to find the right growth strategy so that you will have the currency to be an acquirer someday, then you have a "diner’s" business model and one more respected by capital sources.  Every investor, whether an angel, a VC or a PE guy, is looking for organic growth to drive a start-up to respectable sales levels using as little capital as possible, while being able to generate the cash flow ( or attract additional investors) that will allow them to add new customers and capabilities through judicious acquisition.

    So, be the diner, not the dinner. It sounds a whole lot better to be sitting at the table, knife and fork in hand, ready to tear into that delicious meal than to be the "center of the plate" item about to be consumed and subjected to a different kind of "exit" strategy.

  • I am a big fan of simple business strategies for CEO’s of start ups.

    There is an apocryphal story about  Jim McNerney, now CEO of Boeing and formerly of 3M that he arrived three years ago at his new job with a single Post-It note (get it?). The note purportedly listed just three words:  Airbus, energy, and ethics. Not a bad strategy, considering Airbus was kicking Boeing’s butt, fuel prices were beginning their upward climb and Phil, the former CEO, was sleeping with his secretary and possibly defrauding the U.S. government.  It is now clear that, Post-It note or not, Jim assiduously implemented this strategy.  We can now give him an "A" in all subjects on his report card.  Boeing’s back on top and Airbus is looking like an also ran in the race for the next generation of airplanes.

    Three words on a Post-It note, perhaps stuck to their laptop, can help keep a new CEO focused on the critical issues they face on a daily basis. This is not to say one should not work hard to fulfill all the promises in the business plan, which far exceed three simple strategies.  Rather, the smart CEO will condense all the thinking in the plan to the key elements that will drive the initial success of the business, just like Jim McNerney did at Boeing.

    Cyrus Freidheim, CEO of Chiquita Brands International also had a simple, Post-it note strategy : "Commit & Deliver".  He took over a bankrupt disaster at Chiquita in the early 1990’s, facing huge losses, "banana wars" with the European Union, pressures from NGO’s about alleged employee abuse in developing nations, labor unrest, and to top it off, a shareholder revolt.  Using his simple, but very clear strategy, he turned Chiquita by 2004 into a successful and profitable company, one that has one the respect of many of the same constituents that wanted his head in the early years.

    The most interesting Post-It Note strategy I have seen recently in the start up realm is: "sell the right investors, sell the right employees, sell the right customers".

    This is not a bad Post-It Note strategy for a start up, one that keeps you focused on the critical elements of building a business that will make you, your team, and your investors proud.

  • I recently added a widget linking one of my investments to my Blog, the Tumri Corner Store. Cool gadgets will circulate for your perusal and purchase.  If you do purchase anything, all the "pay for performance" $$$’s I will earn will go to Blue Orchard, the micro finance investment fund where 10% of my venture fund profits are invested.

  • One of my first summer jobs after I had a car and driver’s license was delivering pizza. I vividly remember my first day on the job.

    I showed up at the door of my customers, often fellow high school students, with the pizzas and a big smile on my face.  They stuffed money in my hand, grabbed the pizza and shut the door in my face, rarely paying any attention to me or even thanking me for the delivery.  It took me a few deliveries to figure out that "it’s all about the pizza, not the delivery person", and to accept my fate as a mere conveyor of dinner.

    Entrepreneurs often get carried away and begin to think that they are the raison d’etre for their company. Start ups can be the ultimate power trips for executives who have never before been entrusted with so much authority and money.  Well, hello, it’s the results (the pizza) that everyone is after, not you, genius.

    Remember the business plan with all the projected revenues, profits, product development, and customer acquisition goals and promises?  That’s what your investors and team are waiting to see happen. They care little about you or your next career move.  They want the pizza, they want it hot and they want it when promised.

    So how do you best avoid getting lost in a power trip?

    Your best friends inside the company are your best allies. Make sure you tell them early and often to let you know when you are behaving like a jerk or worst yet, like a little demigod.

    Second, don’t get carried away and try and manage every detail of your start up. Remember Jimmy Carter?  For those of you too young to remember, he was president of the US before Ronald Reagan.  He tried to micromanage the federal government.  Jimmy made a big mistake.  Most any organization or company has a tough time succeeding under micromanagement.  We ended up electing a president who didn’t try and manage the government much at all, just the big, global picture stuff (like economically defeating the Soviet Union).  He had much better results. Rather than micromanaging your start up, rely on your team to get it done, with your coaching.

    Finally, keep asking yourself if you are doing a good job.  If you have any doubts, consult with your board and investors. Sometimes they are reluctant to say anything until it is too late to repair any damage.  Don’t wait until no options remain except to replace you.

    Remember, it’s all about the pizza, not the delivery person.

  • A fellow board member and friend of mine, Randall Pittman, Chairman of Chatham Capital Corporation and Forest Health Services, has an interesting piece of advice useful in many situations facing entrepreneurs.  At critical junctures in deals, whether selling or buying companies or products and services, he urges his teams to "find the Big No" and be able to deal with it.  What he means is that every deal has at least one major issue that needs to be resolved before the deal can be done, and that you better find and resolve those issues early in the process, or risk having to unfavorably renegotiate, or at worst, lose the deal.

    For example, in the on-demand software space, the Big No is often from the CIO, who, late in the sales game, may announce that the company does not want any critical data or applications to reside outside their firewall.  For the sales team working with that client, getting to the CIO early and making sure he is comfortable with the SaaS environment is the best way of avoiding the Big No.

    Early in my consulting career, I was working on the proposed Santa Fe/Southern Pacific rail merger. After years of research, we were finally in front of the (now defunct) Interstate Commerce Commission to present our evidence.  We had, we thought, huge amounts of data showing that the merger was not anti-competitive and should be approved.  The top lawyer presenting the case from Sidley & Austin was wrapping up his presentation, when one of the commissioners pointed to a map showing the mainlines of the two railroads and asked how could the Commission ever approve a merger of two railroads whose track systems so closely paralleled each other.  The Big No reared its ugly head, and our head lawyer gave a poor answer to an obvious question, dooming the merger.  A very embarrassing moment for the consultants and lawyers, and an expensive lesson for the railroads who had spent millions preparing for the merger hearings.

    Finding the Big No in a deal situation may not be an easy task. Here are a few ways that I have used in the past to ferret out major issues early in a deal:

    • Critical Issues Analysis–have your team make a list of possible objectors and their objections up front in the deal process, along with an action plan to ensure that they are addressed before they become a deal killer.
    • Evaluate Past Behaviors–some people like to store Big No’s like chipmunks hide seeds for later use.  Their behavior, while not always predictable, can be observed by how they react in other situations. Ask around your company (or your deal sponsors if you are selling into another company) to determine if any executives exhibit this behavior and what are their usual hot buttons.  Past objections by executives often repeat themselves in new situations, or at least give you insights into a potential range of issues that may be raised.
    • Ask–an obvious, but often overlooked approach, is to just ask key players if they have major objections to the deal.  They may ultimately behave like the chipmunk above, but at least you tried.